Compare models

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4o mini

Every figure below carries the source that reported it and the moment it was observed. Values that failed validation are withheld rather than shown, and a dash means no source we track carries that field for that model.
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4o mini, compared across 7 tracked fields. Each value shows the source that reported it and when.
FieldGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o mini
Context window
1,048,576 (highest of the compared values)Synced from sourceCurrent2h ago
128,000Synced from sourceCurrent2h ago
Input, $/M tokens
0.75Synced from sourceCurrent2h ago
0.15 (lowest of the compared values)Synced from sourceCurrent2h ago
Modality
textSeeded, unreviewedwritten 2mo ago
textSeeded, unreviewedwritten 2mo ago
Licence
proprietarySeeded, unreviewedwritten 2mo ago
proprietarySeeded, unreviewedwritten 2mo ago
OpenRouter id
google/gemini-3.7-flashSynced from sourceCurrent2h ago
openai/gpt-4o-miniSynced from sourceCurrent2h ago
Output, $/M tokens
3.75Synced from sourceCurrent2h ago
0.6Synced from sourceCurrent2h ago
Vendor
GoogleSeeded, unreviewedwritten 2mo ago
OpenAISeeded, unreviewedwritten 2mo ago

Sources: Hugging Face Hub, OpenRouter model catalogue. Most recent observation 2h ago. Where a row is marked, ▲ is the highest of the values shown and ▼ the lowest — arithmetic on the figures above, not a ranking or a recommendation. Rows where neither extreme is meaningful are left unmarked rather than given a direction they do not have.

Change the comparison

Remove one, or open the directory to pick a different set. Up to 3 at a time.


Every figure on this site resolves to the source that reported it, the moment it was observed, and how it was measured. A value that fails validation is withheld rather than shown — withheld means we refused to publish it, not that it is zero.