Compare models

GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 5

Every figure below carries the source that reported it and the moment it was observed. Values that failed validation are withheld rather than shown, and a dash means no source we track carries that field for that model.
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 5, compared across 7 tracked fields. Each value shows the source that reported it and when.
FieldGPT-4oClaude Sonnet 5
Context window
128,000Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
1,000,000 (highest of the compared values)Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
Input, $/M tokens
2.5Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
2 (lowest of the compared values)Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
Modality
textSeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
textSeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
Licence
proprietarySeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
proprietarySeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
OpenRouter id
openai/gpt-4oSynced from sourceCurrentjust now
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
Output, $/M tokens
10Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
10Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
Vendor
OpenAISeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
AnthropicSeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago

Sources: Hugging Face Hub, OpenRouter model catalogue. Most recent observation just now. Where a row is marked, ▲ is the highest of the values shown and ▼ the lowest — arithmetic on the figures above, not a ranking or a recommendation. Rows where neither extreme is meaningful are left unmarked rather than given a direction they do not have.

Change the comparison

Remove one, or open the directory to pick a different set. Up to 3 at a time.


Every figure on this site resolves to the source that reported it, the moment it was observed, and how it was measured. A value that fails validation is withheld rather than shown — withheld means we refused to publish it, not that it is zero.