Compare models

GPT-4o vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Every figure below carries the source that reported it and the moment it was observed. Values that failed validation are withheld rather than shown, and a dash means no source we track carries that field for that model.
GPT-4o vs Gemini 3.7 Flash, compared across 7 tracked fields. Each value shows the source that reported it and when.
FieldGPT-4oGemini 3.7 Flash
Context window
128,000Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
1,048,576 (highest of the compared values)Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
Input, $/M tokens
2.5Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
0.75 (lowest of the compared values)Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
Modality
textSeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
textSeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
Licence
proprietarySeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
proprietarySeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
OpenRouter id
openai/gpt-4oSynced from sourceCurrentjust now
google/gemini-3.7-flashSynced from sourceCurrentjust now
Output, $/M tokens
10Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
3.75Synced from sourceCurrentjust now
Vendor
OpenAISeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago
GoogleSeeded, unreviewedwritten 29d ago

Sources: Hugging Face Hub, OpenRouter model catalogue. Most recent observation just now. Where a row is marked, ▲ is the highest of the values shown and ▼ the lowest — arithmetic on the figures above, not a ranking or a recommendation. Rows where neither extreme is meaningful are left unmarked rather than given a direction they do not have.

Change the comparison

Remove one, or open the directory to pick a different set. Up to 3 at a time.


Every figure on this site resolves to the source that reported it, the moment it was observed, and how it was measured. A value that fails validation is withheld rather than shown — withheld means we refused to publish it, not that it is zero.